Talk:World of Darkness

World of Darkness has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 9, 2021. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the World of Darkness article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find video game sources: "World of Darkness" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk

Archives: 1

Horror Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Role-playing games High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Train simulator (disambiguation) (3 participants)
Preston Arsement (2 participants)
Jackpot World (1 participant)
Bejeweled Stars (5 participants)
Melee (game terminology) (5 participants)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (5 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (5 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (14 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Up date

Why does the incorrect spelling of "vicissitude" lead to this page?--142.58.126.15 (talk) 04:20, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could some version of the WoD cover be uploaded as an image for this article under fair use? The current image is somewhat puzzling as it appears under the section detailing the history of the rulebooks but seems to have more to do with in game lore than anything else. A precedent seems to exist: I checked two other rpg pages (Dungeons and Dragons and Warhammer 40k) and those both had copyrighted covers. Anyway, just putting it out there for any autoconfirmed users who come by. HeathrowArchives (talk) 08:21, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The other world of darkness sections have their rulebooks up too. I think it would be fine. Most wiki articles about books have a picture of the cover on them. Svenxix (talk) 01:56, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Should it be mentioned that the World of Darkness is now switching over to a PDF/POD system? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reflections of Memory (talk • contribs) 02:03, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since this is a role playing game, shouldn't this have an RPG info box on it? In reality WoD covers more than just pen and paper role playing so it might be better to include the info boxes in each of the sub pages, but that would get a little redundant. Svenxix (talk) 02:00, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I know that White Wolf is now referring to their older material as "Classic World of Darkness", but "Old World of Darkness" still seems to be much more commonly used among the fan community. 67.60.251.221 (talk) 04:52, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well if you can find some place that references it, go for it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 32.144.170.174 (talk) 16:44, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing Other Rule Systems

I'm a new editor, so please forgive me if I inadvertantly break etiquette. As I read through this page, I noticed the explanation of the rules for the nWoD make many references or comparisons to the system for the oWoD. This implies a familiarity with those systems on the part of the reader. Should this section be edited to eliminate the assumption of that familiarity? Or should it be perhaps edited to include a brief comparison between the two systems as a separate paragraph or section?Lotus Watcher (talk) 17:46, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chronicles of Darkness

The New World of Darkness is undergoing an official rebranding, now becoming the Chronicles of Darkness. Please update accordingly. 200.199.220.74 (talk) 13:17, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Umbra

Umbra (World of Darkness) redirects here (the article, not this talk page), but is not explained here. I undid the redirect recently, only for my change to be reverted; the reason given for that being that the Umbra article had been supposedly “merged and redirected after community discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umbra (World of Darkness)”. If it had been actually “merged”, then Umbra would be explained in this (World of Darkness) article. However, after performing “find on this page” on this article, the word “Umbra” does not even appear once; I don’t consider that properly merged. Umbra is mentioned several times in the article Werewolf: The Apocalypse as an element in the plot, but is not explained (I going to fix that shortly). I strongly think that if an in-universe concept is going to be mentioned in the plot summary, then that concept must be given an explanation; either as its own article if there is a lot that needs explaining, or as a concise explanation within the article that it is mentioned. ZFT (talk) 18:21, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:World of Darkness/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ProtoDrake (talk · contribs) 09:08, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this. If nothing happens in one week, ping me. --ProtoDrake (talk) 09:08, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexandra IDV: I've looked through this article several times, and I don't see any issues. I think this merits an Instant Pass. --ProtoDrake (talk) 18:41, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's wild, but thank you.--Alexandra^IDV 02:15, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]